TeethRemoval.com

A study in Taiwan looked at those who have had professional tooth scraping and cleaning performed and found that they had reduced risks of stroke and heart attack.

The study showed that more frequent scraping/cleaning was associated with more reduced risk compared to never having teeth cleaned/scraped or occasionally having it performed.

The study looked at over 100,000 people and found that if either a dentist or dental hygienist scraped and cleaned teeth those people in that group had a 24% lower risk of a heart attack and a 13% lower risk of a stroke when compared to those who never had a dental cleaning performed. The people in the study were followed for an average of 7 years.

The study was conducted using data from the Taiwan National Health insurance data base. One of the researchers was Emily (Zu-Yin) Chen, M.D., cardiology fellow at the Veterans General Hospital in Taipei, Taiwan, who stated

“Protection from heart disease and stroke was more pronounced in participants who got tooth scaling at least once a year.”

She went on to further address how tooth scaling appears to reduce inflammation-causing bacterial growth which can potentially lead to stroke or heart disease.

As discussed over at the risks of keeping wisdom teeth page located at http://www.teethremoval.com/risks_of_keeping_wisdom_teeth.html, it is important to see a dentist typically at least once or twice a year in addition to brushing at least twice a day and flossing at least once a day.

If you care about your long term health you should make it a priority to focus on your oral health and make sure you regularly take care of your oral health and visit your dentist.

The source of this study is over at the American Heart Association in an article titled “Professional dental cleanings may reduce risk of heart attack, stroke,” written on November 13, 2011, and located at http://newsroom.heart.org/pr/aha/professional-dental-cleanings-217760.aspx.

Continue Reading

A review article titled “Cluster Headache: Clinical Features and Therapeutic Options” written by Charly Gaul, Hans-Christoph Diener, and Oliver M. Muller published in Deutsches Ärzteblatt International (vol. 108, issue 33, pages 543-549, 2011) provides an interesting look on new options for those with a chronic refractory cluster headache.

The article discusses how 120,000 people in Germany are affected by cluster headache. The attacks are in the periorbital area on one side and last 90 minutes on average. The attacks often posses a circadian and seasonal rhythm. The author lists the diagnostic criteria for cluster headache as from the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-II).

First line drugs for treatment include verapamil and cortisione or lithium and topirmate. In addition, short term relief can be obtained by local anesthetics and steroids along the course of the greater occipital nerve.

I have taken verapamil as discussed over at http://www.teethremoval.com/ndph.html and also had lidocaine injected into my occipital nerve as discussed over at http://www.teethremoval.com/occipital_nerve_block.html as treatment strategies after suffering from a 24/7 headache 2 days after having all 4 healthy wisdom teeth removed. I did not have a positive experience with the occipital nerve block which just led to more lasting pain and problems.

Another treatment strategy is inhaling oxygen which I also have experience with. The author also suggests administering lidocaine solution into the nostril which I also have experience with as well.

In those cluster headaches that are refractory to treatment which is defined as a cluster headache that over 24 months has significant impairment’s to the patient’s quality of life and socioeconomic status there is no uniform treatment strategy. Guidelines recommend verapmil of greater than 400 mg, lithium carbonate of greater than 800 mg, topiramate of greater than 100 mg, indomethacin of greater than 150 mg to exclude hemicrania continua, methysergide of greater than 8 mg, and corticosteroids such as prednisolone of greater than 100 mg.

I also did take indomethacin and prednisolone in the earlier stages of my treatment.

The author goes on to discuss newer invasive procedures that are available for severely impacted patients with chronic cluster headaches that are refractory to treatment which includes deep brain stimulation in the hypothalamus (DBS) and bilateral occipital nerve stimulation (ONS).

The author states

“Ablative procedures such as rhizotomy of the root exit zone of the trigeminal nerve or destructive procedures to the Gasserion ganglion have been abandoned because of severe irreversible side effects (anesthesia dolorosa). Stereotactic radiosurgical interventions (gamma knife) have proved effective in a small case series, albeit at the cost of persistent hyposensitization.”

Other possibilities mentioned include spinal cord stimulation (SCS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) but limited evidence is available for these methods.

Continue Reading

A recent study has been conducted by the Seattle Children’s Research Institute and appeared in Pediatrics, vol 129, number 1, January 2012, pages 1 to 9, titled Headache After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cohort Study, wirtten by Heidi K. Blume and et al.

The article discusses how in the adult population 18% to 33% of those who suffer from traumatic brain injury suffer from headaches 1 year after the injury.

In the child population most of the investigations conducted have been small, retrospective, lacked a control, or involved only short term follow up. Chronic headaches with children are associated with interference in social function, parental productivity, and poor quality of life.

The study randomly selected 1507 patients with TBI and 495 controls with arm injury (AI) for the study. However, some patients were not reachable, others were inegligible, and others refused. This left 512 patients with TBI and 137 with AIs for the study. Headache was reported by 43% of children with mild TBI and 37% of children with moderate/severe TBI, and 26% of the patients in the control group.

The authors noted that the frequency of serious headache appeared to be increased after mild TBI and in teenagers.

Twelve months after injury headache was reported for 41% children with mild TBI, 34% with moderate/severe TBI, and 34% of the patients in the control group.

Girls with mild TBI were found to have a higher prevalence of serious headache after 12 months than controls.

The study found that adolescents and girls had the highest frequency of headaches three months after injury.

The authors state

“The prevalence of migraine is associated with age and gender and is roughly equivalent in boys and girls until puberty when migraine prevalence begins to increase with age in girls, but not boys, reaching adult levels in late adolescence when migraine is much more common in girls than boys. We found a similar pattern of headache after mild TBI.”

Hence the authors speculate that the pathophysiology of posttraumatic headaches after mild TBI share similarities with the pathophysiology of migraine.

The authors did not label the headaches in this study according the the International Classification of Headache Disorders II criteria. I reference this criteia when discussing new daily persistent headache (NDPH) over at http://www.teethremoval.com/ndph.html and also in my limited amount of headaches listed in the headache guide over at http://www.teethremoval.com/headache.html.

In the conclusion of this study the authors state

“This study provides evidence that the response to and recovery from TBI is different in children, adolescents, and adults, and there are likely to be differences in symptoms of and recovery from TBI between boys and girls. Although only a fraction of children and adolescents with TBI develop chronic headaches related to their injury, because thousands of children sustain TBI each year, our findings indicate that many children and adolescents suffer from TBI associated headaches each year.”

Hence the results of this study may have implications for parents as girls and teenagers were found to be at the most increased risk for a headache after a mild TBI which could of course comes from a sports related injury. In some of the cases the headache may only last for a few weeks or months and most will recover after some time.

Dr. Heidi K. Blume has a list of SMART tips to help manage headaches in children and adolescents.

This stands for Sleep, Meals, Activity, Relation, and Trigger avoidance. Additional details can be found in the press release by Seattle Children’s Research Institute which is titled “Study Finds Headaches after Traumatic Brain Injury Highest in Adolescents and Girls” and written on December 5, 2011, and located over at http://www.seattlechildrens.org/Press-Releases/2011/Study-Finds-Headaches-after-Traumatic-Brain-Injury-Highest-in-Adolescents-and-Girls/

Continue Reading

An interesting study titled “Comparison of an alveolar expansion technique and buccal guttering technique in the extraction of mandibular third molar. A pilot study,” appeared in the Open Journal of Stomatology (vol 1, pages 103-108, 2011) written by Babatunde O. Akinbami and Lukcy I. Ofomala from Nigeria.

As stated in the abstract the background for this study was

“The over-ambitious use of surgical drills for almost every case of third molar impaction is on the increase in most established oral surgery centers. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the severity of post operative symptoms of swelling and pain that accompany the use of surgical drill in the buccal guttering technique and the non application of drill in an alveolar expansion technique.”

The authors open in the introduction by discussion how bone around impacted third molar teeth is usually dense and can require the use of cutting drills which can cause vibration and friction.

A total of 10 patients were included in the study. Five patients had the guttering technique performed on the right side and alveolar expansion technique on the left side, 3 patients had the alveolar expansion technique performed on the right side and buccal guttering technique of the left side, and the final 2 cases served as control.

Periapical x-rays were taken to assess the root configuration to the inferior alveolar nerve bundle and impaction against the adjacent second molar. Each patient was given 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine.

The authors discuss how many techniques have been used to remove impacted third molars (wisdom teeth). The authors state

“Other techniques like therapeutic agenesis of the tooth bud using electrocautery, laser energy and use of sclerosing agents have been tried in lower mammals and animals but no human clinical studies are available to attest the validity of these later techniques.”

This study found that most patients included preferred the alveolar expansion technique to reduce the use of drills. The authors point out that it is possible to remove wisdom teeth without using drills.

Near the end of the study the authors state

“The alveolar expansion technique is however, better applicable in younger patients with less dense bone, patients with soft tissue impacted third molar, vertically or mesially impacted tooth with sufficient space for the elevator to move the tooth into, when there is no impaction against the second molars and in cases of close proximity of the neurovascular bundle with enough clearance around the tooth. Absolute contraindications of the use of this technique include high bone density, completely buried tooth/tooth with high Winter’s red line, horizontal impaction associated with impaction against the second molar, distal or vertical impaction with part of the tooth buried under the ascending ramus, anteriorly extended external oblique ridge and in patients with very low pain threshold.”

Continue Reading

Here is an interesting info-graphic about health care in the U.S.

Created by: Medical Billing and Coding Certification

Continue Reading