<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mercury Fillings May Be Less Toxic: Caution Still Needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.teethremoval.com/mercury-fillings-may-be-less-toxic-caution-still-needed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.teethremoval.com/mercury-fillings-may-be-less-toxic-caution-still-needed/</link>
	<description>Making You Think Twice Before Wisdom Teeth Removal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:52:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: wisdom</title>
		<link>http://blog.teethremoval.com/mercury-fillings-may-be-less-toxic-caution-still-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-4333</link>
		<dc:creator>wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teethremoval.com/?p=622#comment-4333</guid>
		<description>Great comment Phil. This particular study was actually done in Canada.

I did not write this study and really never should have published the results on this blog as clearly the mercury in question is going into the body.

A major problem today is news organizations just picking up science results without asking questions. 

The whole point of this website is to &#039;make you think twice before wisdom teeth removal&#039; so obviously I am encouraging a strong hope that people will ask questions and not be intimated by someone who may hold a degree and appear to have more knowledge than them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comment Phil. This particular study was actually done in Canada.</p>
<p>I did not write this study and really never should have published the results on this blog as clearly the mercury in question is going into the body.</p>
<p>A major problem today is news organizations just picking up science results without asking questions. </p>
<p>The whole point of this website is to &#8216;make you think twice before wisdom teeth removal&#8217; so obviously I am encouraging a strong hope that people will ask questions and not be intimated by someone who may hold a degree and appear to have more knowledge than them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Estrera</title>
		<link>http://blog.teethremoval.com/mercury-fillings-may-be-less-toxic-caution-still-needed/comment-page-1/#comment-4324</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Estrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.teethremoval.com/?p=622#comment-4324</guid>
		<description>Do you think the mercury just &#039;evaporates&#039; into the atmosphere? Solids dont evaporate, and being located in the mouth, if there is less mercury over time, the mercury certainy went into the body didn&#039;t it. You&#039;re either doing cover up for the ADA or you&#039;re insanely stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think the mercury just &#8216;evaporates&#8217; into the atmosphere? Solids dont evaporate, and being located in the mouth, if there is less mercury over time, the mercury certainy went into the body didn&#8217;t it. You&#8217;re either doing cover up for the ADA or you&#8217;re insanely stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

